33228
Sovereign Defaults Enter 2016
World Economy

Sovereign Defaults Enter 2016

When it comes to sovereign debt, the term “default” is often misunderstood. It almost never entails the complete and permanent repudiation of the entire stock of debt; indeed, even some Czarist-era Russian bonds were eventually (if only partly) repaid after the 1917 revolution. Rather, non-payment–a “default,” according to credit-rating agencies, when it involves private creditors–typically spurs a conversation about debt restructuring, which can involve maturity extensions, coupon-payment cuts, grace periods, or face-value reductions (so-called “haircuts”).
If history is a guide, such conversations may be happening a lot in 2016, Carmen Reinhart wrote for Project Syndicate.
Like so many other features of the global economy, debt accumulation and default tends to occur in cycles. Since 1800, the global economy has endured several such cycles, with the share of independent countries undergoing restructuring during any given year oscillating between zero and 50%. Whereas one- and two-decade lulls in defaults are not uncommon, each quiet spell has invariably been followed by a new wave of defaults.

Chronic Arrears  
The most recent default cycle includes the emerging-market debt crises of the 1980s and 1990s. Most countries resolved their external-debt problems by the mid-1990s, but a substantial share of countries in the lowest-income group remain in chronic arrears with their official creditors.
Like outright default or the restructuring of debts to official creditors, such arrears are often swept under the rug, possibly because they tend to involve low-income debtors and relatively small dollar amounts. But that does not negate their eventual capacity to help spur a new round of crises, when sovereigns who never quite got a handle on their debts are, say, met with unfavorable global conditions.
And, indeed, global economic conditions–such as commodity-price fluctuations and changes in interest rates by major economic powers such as the United States or China–play a major role in precipitating sovereign-debt crises.

Serious Squalls
As 2016 begins, there are clear signs of serious debt/default squalls on the horizon. We can already see the first white-capped waves.
For some sovereigns, the main problem stems from internal debt dynamics. Ukraine’s situation is certainly precarious, though, given its unique drivers, it is probably best not to draw broader conclusions from its trajectory.
Greece’s situation, by contrast, is all too familiar. The government continued to accumulate debt until the burden was no longer sustainable. When the evidence of these excesses became overwhelming, new credit stopped flowing, making it impossible to service existing debts. Last July, in highly charged negotiations with its official creditors–the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund–Greece defaulted on its obligations to the IMF. That makes Greece the first–and, so far, the only–advanced economy ever to do so.
But, as is so often the case, what happened was not a complete default so much as a step toward a new deal. Greece’s European partners eventually agreed to provide additional financial support, in exchange for a pledge from Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’s government to implement difficult structural reforms and deep budget cuts. Unfortunately, it seems that these measures did not so much resolve the Greek debt crisis as delay it.
Another economy in serious danger is the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which urgently needs a comprehensive restructuring of its $73 billion in sovereign debt. Recent agreements to restructure some debt are just the beginning; in fact, they are not even adequate to rule out an outright default.
It should be noted, however, that while such a “credit event” would obviously be a big problem, creditors may be overstating its potential external impacts. They like to warn that although Puerto Rico is a commonwealth, not a state, its failure to service its debts would set a bad precedent for US states and municipalities.
Some of the biggest risks lie in the emerging economies, which are suffering primarily from a sea change in the global economic environment. During China’s infrastructure boom, it was importing huge volumes of commodities, pushing up their prices and, in turn, growth in the world’s commodity exporters, including large emerging economies like Brazil.

Short URL : http://goo.gl/OXRxow
  1. http://goo.gl/5ujs5O
  • http://goo.gl/JSL0uw
  • http://goo.gl/F8BQG1
  • http://goo.gl/wuggxR
  • http://goo.gl/YPdNRi

You can also read ...

Singapore PM Says Economy Needs Restructuring
Singapore’s economic growth could exceed 3% in 2017, higher...
World GDP is expected to advance 3.5% in 2017—its best year since 2011—and 3.7% in 2018.
Nearly 10 years after the financial crisis brought the global...
Kuwait Needs $100b Over 5 Years to Cover Deficit
Kuwait will need $100 billion of additional financing over the...
Supporters of EU-Mercosur Free-Trade Pact Push for Deal
Supporters of a free trade pact between the EU and the...
Emmanuel Macron (L), French Labor Minister Muriel Penicaud (C) and Jean-Claude Juncker.
The EU is trying to present itself as more socially just,...
The OECD believes that tax evasions cost governments around the world as much as $240 billion a year in lost revenue.
They have revolutionized the way people live, but are US tech...
China to Help Shortfalls in Pension Funds
China on Saturday announced a pilot program to help pension...
Few Signs of Progress in NAFTA Talks
Negotiations in Mexico to update NAFTA have not made much...

Trending

Googleplus