Party Over for US Superrich?
World Economy

Party Over for US Superrich?

For 20 years, the effective tax rates for those at the very top of the income ladder generally dropped. Then, in 2013, after a pair of unusual tax increases negotiated by the (President Barak) Obama White House went into effect, taxes went up on this group.
According to data released Wednesday by the Internal Revenue Service, the average rate for federal income taxes paid by the country’s top 400 income earners rose from 16.7% in 2012 to 22.9% in 2013, almost exactly where they stood in the early 2000s, though well below the level of the early 1990s. By any measure, that’s a victory for the cause of tax justice, analysts said, SFGate reported.
But the recent rate increases, many experts also noted, still do little to overcome the broader issue of a separate, cushier tax system for the ultrawealthy.
“The 2013 increase in the capital gains rate was a significant move towards greater tax fairness,” said Jared Bernstein, who was the top economic adviser to Vice President Joe Biden during President Obama’s first term. “But when you consider the breadth of the tax avoidance industry, much of which is about sheltering income from exposure to any tax liability at all, it’s just a drop in the bucket.”

 Ultrawealthy Benefit
Even with the higher tax rates in 2013, the 400 highest-earning taxpayers, who took home an average of $265 million that year, paid a significantly lower share of their reported income in taxes than those just below them.
For example, the top 1% of earners—whose average income was $1.24 million—paid roughly 27% of their income to the IRS.
Moreover, when payroll taxes are taken into account, many people with much lower incomes, in the range of $100,000 to $150,000, pay effective tax rates that are similar to or even higher than those imposed on the rich.
Essentially, the rich have benefited from two crucial developments over the past few decades: The first was a declining tax rate on investment income, which fell in the late 1990s under pressure from a Republican Congress after President Bill Clinton raised income tax rates in 1993. It fell even further under President George W. Bush in the early 2000s, who cut both ordinary income rates and investment rates. (Both went back up with the 2013 tax increase, though the rate on investment income remains lower than in the early 1990s.)
Because the ultrawealthy derive an outsize portion of their income from investments, these tax cuts disproportionately benefited them.


Short URL : http://goo.gl/jO3Z6S
  1. http://goo.gl/QUz34H
  • http://goo.gl/Mex50p
  • http://goo.gl/JoCCsU
  • http://goo.gl/6Mve7j
  • http://goo.gl/RFf7BW

You can also read ...

Philippines Growing Faster Than Expected
The Philippine economy grew at a faster than expected 6.9%...
The British economy will hardly expand 0.3-0.4% per quarter through to June 2018, with growth of 1.5% this year and 1.3% the next.
British economic growth will remain tepid over the coming few...
Italy Braces  for $1b Loss
Italy’s failure to qualify for the 2018 football World Cup in...
Siemens to Cut 6,900 Jobs
Labor unions have reacted angrily to layoff plans unveiled by...
Cheap ECB Cash Still Key for Eurozone
The eurozone economy remains dependent on cheap credit and the...
The rupee, bonds and stocks rallied after Moody’s upgraded India to Baa2 from Baa3 and said reforms being pushed through by Modi’s government will help stabilize rising levels of debt.
Forget India's economic troubles this year. Moody's thinks...
Smaller increases at the gas pumps helped Canada’s  annual rate of inflation ease in October.
Canada›s rate of inflation came in at 1.4% on a year-over-year...
IMF Sees Economic Revival in Myanmar
The International Monetary Fund on Friday forecast an economic...