Fiscal Austerity, political instability in Europe
World Economy

Fiscal Austerity, political instability in Europe

Over the last five years, the eurozone has, without explicit popular consent, maintained a strict policy focus on fiscal austerity and structural reforms – despite serious social repercussions, not only in the Mediterranean periphery and Ireland, but even in a “core” European Union country like France. Unless eurozone leaders rethink their approach, the Syriza party’s success in Greece’s recent general election could turn out to be just one more step toward a future of social fragmentation and political instability in Europe. Or it could mark the beginning of a realistic and beneficial re-orientation of Europe’s economic strategy, Kemal Dervis wrote for Foreign Policy.
 Of course, fiscal sustainability is vital to prevent a disruptive debt refinancing and inspire confidence among investors and consumers. But there is no denying that it is much easier to support fiscal austerity when one is wealthy enough not to rely on public services or be at serious risk of becoming mired in long-term unemployment.
For the millions of workers – and especially young people – with no job prospects, fiscal sustainability simply cannot be the only priority. When unemployment benefits are slashed, they are the ones who suffer. And when budget cuts extend to education, it is their children who are unable to gain the skills they need to reach their future potential.

  Greeks Suffering
Austerity-induced suffering is particularly extreme in Greece. Severe pension cuts are preventing the elderly from living out their lives with dignity. A large burden has been placed on those who actually pay their taxes, while many – often the wealthiest, who long ago stashed their money abroad – continue to evade their obligations. Health care has lapsed, with many cancer patients losing access to life-saving treatment. Suicides are on the rise. Yet Greece’s creditors have continued to ignore these developments.
Social sustainability is essential for long-term economic success. A country cannot prosper if its educational system lacks the resources and capacity to prepare its children to thrive in the digital economy. Likewise, a reform program cannot be implemented if inequality, poverty, and social frustration strengthen extremist political parties, such as Greece’s overtly fascist Golden Dawn party or France’s far-right, anti-Europe National Front, which now boasts 25% electoral support.

  Easy Targets
When times are tough, immigrants and minorities become easy targets. Regardless of what today’s corporate profit reports and stock indices may show, a country cannot achieve inclusive, sustainable success – in economic or human terms – if these fundamental social issues are not adequately addressed. Of course, fiscal caution cannot be abandoned; after all, if governments or the private sector were to spend borrowed or newly minted money freely, the result would simply be more crises, which would hurt the poor most. But social sustainability must be an integral part of a country’s economic program, not an afterthought.
The persistent tendency to pay lip service to social sustainability, while implementing economic programs focused on unrelenting austerity, is a leading cause of political instability in Europe.
  Ensuring Livelihood
Moreover, governments that are now focused narrowly on microeconomic issues need to devote the same level of attention and commitment to designing and implementing social policies that focus explicitly on ensuring the livelihoods, health, education, and housing of the most vulnerable segments of the population. And, using new technology to analyze large amounts of data, they should boost the efficiency of social programs, while encouraging the active participation of concerned citizens.
The European Commission and the IMF have admitted their errors – not only the inaccurate macroeconomic forecasts on which the Greek program was based, but also the decision not to account for social sustainability – and have acknowledged that the program has not produced the expected results. Yet, for some reason, Greece’s creditors refuse to negotiate with the new government (which enjoys strong domestic support) to develop a new program that incorporates debt relief, a lower fiscal surplus, and structural reforms that support growth and promote social cohesion. This must not continue.


Short URL : http://goo.gl/O3NjTE

You can also read ...

Close to 40% of digital transformation initiatives will be supported by AI capabilities.
The digital economy in Asia-Pacific, or APAC, is expected to...
An electronic stock indicator of a securities firm in Tokyo.
As investors come to terms with the impending end of easy...
Most economists would agree that Italy needs faster economic growth if it is to resolve its public debt  and banking-sector problems in an orderly manner.
Italy’s economy is growing again, but it’s still the worst...
Maersk is expanding its competitive universe to include different types of companies.
The world’s largest container company will start looking for...
Lloyds Profits Miss Forecasts
Lloyds Banking Group PLC raised its 2017 dividend by 20% and...
NZ Says Pacific Trade Deal Will Boost GDP
New Zealand estimates a Pacific trade deal would boost its...
CBs May Top Inflation Targets
Not only will central banks meet their inflation targets, they...
Pak Current Account Gap Widens
Pakistan’s current account deficit widened 28.74% on a month-...