Canada Court Ruling Violates Int'l Law

Tehran rejected a recent ruling issued by Canada's Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Iran, saying the verdict violates international law.

"This ruling contravenes the basic principles of the legal impunity of governments and their assets, and is unacceptable," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qasemi said on Sunday, Press TV reported. 

Justice Glenn Hainey ruled on February 8 that the Islamic Republic had to pay $300,000 in legal costs to those who claim to be victims of Iranian support for resistance groups. 

The plaintiffs had sought compensation in the Ontario court under Canada's Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act. The verdict has given Iran 30 days to pay the sum.

Qasemi said Tehran has already conveyed its formal protest to the Canadian government and reserved the right to take political and legal measures in this regard.

In June 2016, the same court ordered $13 million in non-diplomatic Iranian assets to be given to three groups of plaintiffs.

The decision was similar to the US Supreme Court's ruling in April 2016 to hand over $2 billion in Iran's frozen assets to American families of those killed in the 1983 bombing of US Marine Corps barracks in Beirut and other attacks.

Iran's President Hassan Rouhani announced at that time that the country had filed a lawsuit against the US with the International Court of Justice—the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. 

Earlier this month, Iran's Presidential Office said in a statement that the lawsuit had been officially set into motion.

Washington's seizure of Iran's assets is against the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights signed by the two countries in August 1955—referred to as the 1955 Treaty—and is "still effective", the statement said.