The September vote on the Iran nuclear deal is billed as a titanic standoff between US President Barack Obama and Congress. Yet even if lawmakers reject the agreement, it is not game-over for the White House.
A congressional vote of disapproval would not prevent Obama from acting on his own to start putting the accord in place. While he probably would take some heavy criticism, this course would let him add the foreign policy breakthrough to his second-term list of accomplishments, the AP wrote on Sunday.
Obama does not need a congressional OK to give Iran most of the billions of dollars in relief from economic sanctions that it would get under the agreement, as long as Tehran honors its commitments to limit its nuclear program — at least for now.
Political Reverberations
"A resolution to disapprove the Iran agreement may have substantial political reverberations, but limited practical impact," says Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "It would not override President Obama's authority to enter into the agreement."
The US lawmakers on their summer break are deciding how to vote.
With Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress, the House and Senate are expected to turn down the deal.
Obama has pledged to veto such a resolution of disapproval, so the question has turned to whether Congress could muster the votes to override him, in what would be a stinging, bipartisan vote of no-confidence against the president. And Obama would forfeit the authority he now enjoys to waive sanctions that Congress has imposed.
But Democrats and Republicans have predicted that his expected veto will be sustained — that opponents lack the votes to one-up Obama. More than half of the Senate Democrats and Independents of the 34 needed to sustain a veto are backing the deal. There is one notable defection so far — New York's Chuck Schumer, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate and the party leader-in-waiting.
In the House, more than 45 Democrats have expressed support. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California has spoken confidently about rounding up the votes to save the deal. Ten House Democrats have announced their opposition.
Executive Orders
Obama could suspend some US sanctions. He could issue new orders to permit financial transactions that otherwise are banned now. On the financial sector, Obama could use executive orders to remove certain Iranians and entities, including nearly two dozen Iranian banks, from US lists, meaning they no longer would be subject to economic penalties.
Only Congress can terminate legislative sanctions, and they are some of the toughest, aimed at Iran's energy sector, central bank and essential parts of its economy. Still, experts say Obama, on his own, can neutralize the effect of some of those sanctions, too, and work with the Europeans on softening others.
"Obama can give most of the sanctions relief under the agreement through executive order," said Mark Dubowitz, a leading sanctions proponent with the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies. If Obama and the Europeans erase the Iranian banks from the sanctions list, those institutions would regain access to the global financial system.
The September votes will not be the final word.
One looming question is whether Congress should try to reauthorize the Iran Sanctions Act, which authorizes many of the congressional sanctions. Democratic Senator Bob Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk have introduced legislation to renew it.
Iran could interpret a US move to reauthorize the law as a breach of the nuclear agreement. Administration officials will not say whether it is or is not, only that it is premature to address it.
Renegotiation a Nonstarter
The administration says renegotiating the agreement is a nonstarter.
In a webcast, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told members of the Jewish Federations across North America and the Jewish Council of Public Affairs that trying to renegotiate the deal was "about the riskiest strategy" he could imagine. "I just don't think that's a credible Plan B."
Schumer and other opponents think the administration should go back to the bargaining table.
Over history, the US Congress has rejected outright or demanded changes to more than 200 treaties and international agreements, including 80 that were multilateral.
