National
0

IAEA Report Fails to Reflect Iran’s Extensive Cooperation

IAEA Report Fails to Reflect Iran’s Extensive Cooperation
IAEA Report Fails to Reflect Iran’s Extensive Cooperation

A senior diplomat said a recent report by the International Atomic Energy Agency on Iran’s nuclear program is “one-sided” and fails to reflect Iran’s extensive cooperation with the UN nuclear agency.
Iran’s ambassador to Vienna-based international organizations Mohammad Reza Ghaebi, made the remarks on Monday after the IAEA reported that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium had increased to more than 18 times the limit set out in the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.
The cap in the nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was set at 300 kg of a specific compound, the equivalent of 202.8 kg of enriched uranium.
The report by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi also said Iran was continuing its enrichment of uranium to levels higher than the 3.67% limit in the nuclear accord.
In a separate report also issued on Monday, the IAEA claimed it still had questions which were “not clarified” regarding previous undeclared nuclear material at three Iranian sites.
The report said Iran has offered the explanation of an “act of sabotage by a third party to contaminate” the sites, but added no proof had been provided to corroborate this.
“The IAEA director general’s report does not reflect Iran’s extensive cooperation with the IAEA,” Ghaebi said, ISNA reported.
“The report repeats exactly what the director general presented to the European Parliament before the third round of technical talks [on the alleged traces of uranium found in undeclared sites].”
Iran’s envoy said the report, by putting aside the detailed, reasoned and technical arguments put forward by the Iranian side and unfairly calling them invalid, continues to rely on the agency’s predetermined assumptions and presents its one-sided conclusion accordingly.

 

 

Unconstructive Approach 

“The Islamic Republic of Iran considers this approach unconstructive and destructive to the close relations and ongoing cooperation between Iran and the IAEA,” Ghaebi noted, adding that it “believes that the IAEA should realize the ruinous consequences of publishing such one-sided reports, which could provide the necessary excuse for opponents of Iran-IAEA relations as well as the sworn critics of the revival of the JCPOA.”
Pointing to the IAEA’s first report, Ghaebi said the entire peaceful nuclear activities of the Islamic Republic have been carried out within the framework of the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, and in accordance with the legal compensatory measures in the law adopted by the Iranian parliament following the suspension of Iran’s nuclear commitments due to non-fulfillment of obligations by other parties.
“Therefore, the agency will not gain access to the memory information of its deployed cameras and other information in this regard until an agreement is reached for the revival of the JCPOA,” Ghaebi underlined.
The senior diplomat said the Islamic Republic has repeatedly warned the IAEA officials of the need to refrain from disclosing detailed information on the country’s nuclear activities based on the importance of the principle of confidentiality with regard to the IAEA regulations, but the issue has not received serious attention from the agency.
The Monday reports came as talks in the Austrian capital Vienna to revive the landmark 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers remain stalled since March.
Meanwhile, Russia’s lead negotiator to the Vienna talks Mikhail Ulyanov reacted to the leakage of the UN agency’s reports to the mass media, and said the move would lead to a lot of speculations before and during the meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors next week.
“As always, the IAEA Director General’s reports on Iran were immediately leaked to mass media today. We can expect a lot of speculations in the days to come and heated debates in the IAEA Board of Governors next week,” Ulyanov wrote in a tweet.
Several rounds of negotiations between Iran and world powers have been held in the Austrian capital since April 2021 to revive the nuclear deal.
Talks have been on hold since March as the US insists on its refusal to undo its past wrongs, including removing Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps from its foreign terrorist organization list.
Iran maintains that IRGC’s designation in 2019 was part of former president Donald Trump administration’s so-called maximum pressure campaign against Iran, and therefore, it has to be reversed unconditionally.
The Biden administration disagrees, even though it has admitted that Trump’s maximum pressure policy has been a failure. It has retained the IRGC’s designation and the economic sanctions as leverage in the talks.
 

Add new comment

Read our comment policy before posting your viewpoints

Financialtribune.com