Despite official condemnation of Saudi Arabia’s executions, many wonder why Germany does not take action against the kingdom. Critics think arms exports to the country should have been stopped a long time ago.
Many countries have condemned Saudi Arabia’s execution of Shia cleric Nimr al-Nimr together with three other Shias and 43 alleged members of Al-Qaeda .
The Saudi Embassy in Tehran was even attacked by protesters, and in response, countries including Bahrain and the UAE, backed Riyadh by bringing their diplomats back from Tehran, Deutsche Welle reported.
Germany, France and other world powers have urged Saudi Arabia and Iran to engage in dialogue, but many wonder if words are enough. Even as western powers like Germany condemn Saudi Arabia’s policies, they continue to export arms to the country, and thus benefit from its conflicts, critics claim.
Germany’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Martin Schafer, said at a news conference that Germany opposes the death penalty, but added that he is “unaware of any government plans to impose sanctions for this reason”.
In the first half of 2015 alone, Germany approved a number of arms exports to the Persian Gulf region, despite concerns about conflicts and human rights violations. Among the exports approved were 15 patrol boats for Saudi Arabia.
The latest report showed that the value of Germany’s arms sales, the world’s fourth-biggest arms exporter, was €3.5 billion ($4 billion) in the first six months of 2015 compared to €2.2 billion in the first half of 2014.
Restrictive Policy?
“In 2008 the German government gave a license to Hecker & Koch, a leading German gunmaker, to manufacture G36 rifles, so the company made tens of thousands of them and they are now used by the army of Saudi Arabia,” Jürgen Grasslin, a German anti-weapons activist, told DW.
“From a moral point of view this was a criminal act, because these small arms—as they are called—are the deadliest weapons on earth. Small arms have killed millions of people every year in wars and conflicts,” he says.
But according to the Economy Ministry, Germany is only supplying Saudi Arabia with 4-wheel-drive vehicles, protective parts for armored vehicles, drones and launchers, but no tanks, machine guns or any automatic weapon.
“We have a very restrictive policy regarding the approval of weapons to be delivered to this region, and to Saudi Arabia in particular,” says Andreas Audretsch, a spokesperson for the German Ministry of Economy.
“The case of ‘Heckler & Koch’ is a good example,” he says.
Audretsch was referring to a lawsuit the company filed against the German government for failing to approve the export of parts needed to produce the G36 in Saudi Arabia.
“The case shows that in recent months and years the policy is very restrictive,” Audretsch said. Grasslin is not impressed by this.
“Our Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel told his voters before the 2013 election that when he is in power there will be no weapons exports to countries that violate human rights, but you see what happens now,” he complains.
“In 2014, he doubled the weapon exports from €915 million (about $988 million) to €1.8 billion, including to countries that are violating human rights or are in war. This step was meant to support the German weapon industry, and for that you have three reasons: profit, profit and profit.”
The Economy Ministry argues that the decision of how much and to whom Germany exports its weapons is not a question of economy, but of the situation in each particular region, adding that there is no German economic interest in the pure sense of the word.
According to Grasslin, this is not entirely true.
“In the past few years the German arms industry has been in a crisis,” he says, especially because the German Army—the Bundeswehr—is reducing its orders.
Grasslin claims that arms companies are now searching for new countries to sell arms to, as well as aiming to increase consumption among countries that already use German weaponry.
“Germany delivers weapon to the United States, knowing that it is in war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and so on,” he says. “Germany also delivers arms to NATO partners.”
But what surprises him is that Germany is sending arms to what he calls “third states”—countries that are neither members of the EU or NATO, such as Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman—all of whom are good customers for German weapons.
“Germany profits from all the instability in that region,” Grasslin stresses, “and military forces in these countries love German weapons because they are usually accurate and advanced.”
A Weapon-Free World
For Grasslin, the main problem is the hypocrisy around military industries.
“We always say that Germany is a country which stands for humanity, morals and ethics. Sometimes we do, but this coin has a back side to it, a dark side. And the dark side is giving weapons to dictatorships all around the world.”
But despite his intensions, one might claim that Grasslin’s aim—for a major industrial country to completely shut down its arms industry—is not only optimistic, but naive.
“Some 30 years ago I was asked whether it’s realistic to stop all weapon exports. What I said back then is that I’d like to stop all exports of small arms, ban all landmines and ban cluster bombs—and people looked at me as if I were an alien,” he recalls.
“And now, there is an international ban on landmines and cluster bombs and we have the international arms trade treaty, a sort of control on conventional weapons, so we are on the right way,” he said.
Grasslin says he knows it’s idealistic to ban weapons sales in the Middle East and Asia, but claims it’s the only way to bring peace to these regions.
