28292
Can Indo-Pak Backchannel Diplomacy Work?
International

Can Indo-Pak Backchannel Diplomacy Work?

In his massive recent book, “Neither a Hawk nor a Dove: An Insider’s Account of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy” (Penguin/Viking), 2015, Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri, former foreign minister of Pakistan (2002-07), provides not only a broad assessment of Pakistan’s foreign (also defense) policy since independence in 1947 but also makes a strong case for the resumption of the stalled backchannel diplomacy between India and Pakistan to find a fair and just solution to the vexed dispute on Kashmir and other issues.
He explicates and defends the framework for a Kashmir settlement evolved through backchannel diplomacy during 2005-07. He says the endemic problems between the two countries can only be addressed by such diplomacy, citing Henry Kissinger who stressed its importance and held in addition that in resolving complex international crises, “the test is not absolute satisfaction but balanced dissatisfaction” (p. 353).
Kasuri’s call for the resumption of backchannel diplomacy between India and Pakistan is no doubt very important given the sharp deterioration in Indo-Pak relations, which led to the abrupt cancellation of the National Security Advisor-level talks in New Delhi between the two countries on August 23-24. The leading Indian diplomat and politician, Mani Shankar Aiyar, has consistently argued in favor of “uninterrupted and uninterruptible” dialogue between the two countries as essential for establishing peace in the region, Kadayam Subramanian wrote for Asia Times.
Kasuri’s detailed discussion of his country’s foreign and defense policy includes an account of the framework for the resolution of the Kashmir conflict evolved during the time of President Parvez Musharraf and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh through backchannel diplomacy. This is not widely known.

  Four-Point Formula
India and Pakistan became nuclear-armed powers in May 1998. Since war is not an option between the two nuclear armed neighbors, a peace process was initiated in February 1999 when Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee visited Pakistan and had discussions with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif leading to the much acclaimed Lahore Declaration. The representatives of the two prime ministers held backchannel discussions.
Our author, as the then Pakistan foreign minister, made his first visit to India in September 2004. Manmohan Singh, who had become the prime minister of India in 2004, remained in that position till 2014. Kasuri was able to meet the separatist Kashmiri leaders of the All-Party Hurryiat Conference and others. Pakistan has always felt that these leaders had a key role to play in resolving the Kashmir conflict.
The then foreign minister of India Natwar Singh visited Pakistan in February 2005 and the Muzaffarabad-Srinagar bus service was started in April 2005. Ambassador Lambah was appointed by India as the backchannel negotiator in February 2005 to carry forward the peace process.
President Musharraf too made a successful visit to India in April 2005 on the invitation of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. A joint statement was issued proclaiming the irreversibility of the peace process. LK Advani, India’s leader of the opposition in parliament, visited Pakistan in June 2005. The separatist Kashmiri leaders from India too were able to visit Pakistan for facilitating a dialogue between the three main stakeholders on Kashmir generating positive ideas, which were discussed in the backchannel negotiations. Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee had already met the Kashmiri separatist leaders earlier in 2004.
The Indian foreign minister visited Pakistan in October 2005 and reviewed the second round of the composite dialogue. Our author reiterated the need to continue backchannel negotiations. The July 2006 Mumbai train bombings led to the setting up of a bilateral anti-error mechanism in March 2007. Four meetings of the mechanism were held till October 2008.
Detailed and concrete work towards real progress was made via the backchannel negotiations from 2004 to 2007. The author made an appropriate evaluation of the process before quitting office in 2007. The Mumbai terrorist attacks in November 2008 came after the backchannel negotiations had reached a high level.
On the basis of these negotiations, President Musharraf and Prime Minister Singh agreed on a four-point formula for settlement of the Kashmir conflict which is explained by the author. Briefly, they were: i) Jammu and Kashmir would not be made independent; ii) borders would not be redrawn; iii) Line of Control would be made irrelevant; and iv) a joint mechanism would be established for management of both parts of Kashmir. Thus, both countries found out that a solution to Kashmir and other disputes was feasible.
The author reiterates that the origins of the backchannel talks are to be traced to the time of prime ministers Sharif and Vajpayee following their meeting in February 1999 at Lahore. In January 2004, the joint statement issued by Prime Minister Vajpayee and President Musharraf stipulated that the Kashmir conflict should be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both parties.

  Political Difficulties
However, the envisaged visit of Prime Minister Singh to Pakistan to sign the agreement on the Sir Creek dispute had to be postponed in view of the forthcoming state assembly elections in India. Further, President Musharraf faced political difficulties because of a reference he made against the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan to the Supreme Judicial Council, which led to his eventual departure from office.
The achievements of the backchannel negotiations for peace between the two countries remain to be consolidated.
The author hopes that the backchannel mechanism found to be useful by two former prime ministers of India would be utilized by Narendra Modi, the current prime minister of India, to settle the conflict issues between India and Pakistan.
The Hindu nationalist prime minister of India has hardened his stance on Pakistan. He has not only objected to any contact between Pakistani leaders and those of the separatist All-Party Hurriyat Conference in the Kashmir Valley (allowed earlier) but has insisted that a discussion of cross-border terrorism should precede a debate on Kashmir.
Further, it is reported that in a tit-for-tat move against Pakistan’s focus on human rights violations by the security forces in Kashmir, India is making a show of its support to the cause of dissidents in Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan.
Is there room for backchannel diplomacy here? Kasuri would probably say ‘yes’ since there is no other option short of war!
Should Kasuri have met the incumbent prime minister of India to share his thoughts on this grave subject?

 

Short URL : https://goo.gl/D0LXvL
  1. https://goo.gl/qm6AdT
  • https://goo.gl/h08F1V
  • https://goo.gl/vYJEzO
  • https://goo.gl/aYql0L
  • https://goo.gl/pxUeKm

You can also read ...

Renewed Tensions Between US and North Korea
North Korea said on Saturday targeting the US mainland with...
San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick (7) and outside linebacker Eli Harold (58) kneel during the playing of the national anthem before an NFL football game against the Atlanta Falcons in Atlanta on Dec. 18, 2016.
US President Donald Trump is embracing an “us versus them”...
Car Bomber Targets NATO Convoy in Afghanistan
At least three civilians were wounded when a suicide car bomb...
Tensions Rise in Iraq Ahead of Kurdish Secession Vote
Hundreds demonstrated in eastern Iraq against a planned...
Merkel Wins Fourth Term as Far-Right Enters German Parliament
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives beat their rivals on...
Saudi King to Visit Russia
The visit of Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz to Russia will be...
UN Medics See Evidence of Rape in Myanmar Army’s Cleansing of Rohingya
Doctors treating some of the 429,000 Rohingya Muslims who have...

Trending

Googleplus