Britain's New King

With the death of his mother Queen Elizabeth on Thursday, Prince Charles has finally become king of the United Kingdom and 14 other realms, ending a wait of more than 70 years - the longest by an heir in British history.

The role will be daunting. His late mother was overwhelmingly popular and respected, but she leaves a royal family that has seen reputations tarnished and relationships strained, including over lingering allegations of racism against Buckingham Palace officials, Reuters wrote on Thursday.

Charles confronts those challenges at the age of 73, the oldest monarch to take the throne in a lineage that dates back 1,000 years, with his second wife Camilla, who still divides public opinion, by his side.

To detractors, the new king is weak, vain, interfering, and ill-equipped for the role of sovereign. He has been ridiculed for talking to plants and obsessing over architecture and the environment, and will long be associated with his failed first marriage to the late Princess Diana.

Supporters say that is a distortion of the good work he does, that he is simply misunderstood and that in areas such as climate change he has been ahead of his time.

They argue he is thoughtful and concerned about his fellow Britons from all communities and walks of life. His Prince's Trust charity has helped more than one million unemployed and disadvantaged young people since its launch almost 50 years ago.

"The trouble is you are in a no-win situation. If you do absolutely nothing at all ... they are going to complain about that," Charles once told a TV documentary. "If you try and get stuck in, do something to help, they also complain."

Throughout his life, Charles has been caught between a modernizing monarchy, trying to find its place in a fast-changing and more egalitarian society, while maintaining traditions that give the institution its allure.

That tension can be seen through the lives of his own sons.

The eldest, William, 40, now the heir himself, leads a life of traditional duty, charity work and military pageantry.

Younger son Harry, 37, resides outside Los Angeles with his American ex-actress wife Meghan and family, forging a new career more in keeping with Hollywood than Buckingham Palace.

The brothers, once very close, are now barely on speaking terms.

Upbringing

Groomed from birth to be king one day, Charles Philip Arthur George was born at Buckingham Palace on Nov. 14, 1948, in the 12th year of the reign of his grandfather, King George VI.

Just 3 when he became heir apparent after his mother became queen in 1952, Charles's upbringing was always different from previous future monarchs.

Unlike predecessors educated by private tutors, Charles went to Hill House school in West London before becoming a boarder at Cheam School in Berkshire, which was attended by his father Prince Philip and where he was later head boy.

He was then sent to Gordonstoun, a tough boarding school in Scotland. He described his time there as hell: he was lonely and bullied. "A prison sentence," he reportedly said. "Colditz with kilts."

Breaking with tradition again, he went to Trinity College, Cambridge, to study archaeology and physical and social anthropology but later changed to history.

During his studies he was formally crowned Prince of Wales, the title traditionally held by the heir to the throne, at a grand ceremony in 1969, having spent nine weeks at a Welsh university where he said he faced almost daily protests from nationalists. The following year he became the first British heir to receive a degree.

Like many royals before him, he joined the armed forces, initially with the Royal Air Force in 1971 and later with the navy, rising through the ranks to command the minesweeper HMS Bronington, before ending active service in 1976.

In 1979, his great-uncle Lord Mountbatten, who he described as "the grandfather I never had", was killed in an Irish Republican Army (IRA) bombing, a loss that deeply affected him. "It seemed as if the foundation of all that we held dear in life had been torn apart irreparably," he later said.

On leaving the navy in 1976 he searched for a role in public life as there was no clear constitutional job for the heir, saying he had to "make it up as you go along".

"That's what makes it so interesting, challenging and of course complicated," he said of his role in a documentary to mark his 70th birthday.

Lady Diana

However, for many in Britain and beyond, Charles will always be associated with his doomed marriage to Lady Diana Spencer and his affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, the love of his life.

When he and Diana wed in 1981 in front of a global television audience of some 750 million people, his bride seemed the perfect choice.

All initially seemed well, and sons William and Harry were born in 1982 and 1984 respectively. But behind the scenes, the marriage had problems and Diana blamed Camilla for its eventual breakdown in 1992, famously saying in a TV interview: "there were three of us in this marriage".

Charles said he had remained faithful "until it (the marriage) became irretrievably broken down". The couple divorced in 1996.

When Diana was killed in a Paris car crash in 1997 there were vitriolic outpourings in the press against him and Camilla, and his public popularity sank. In 2005 he finally married Camilla.

However, the shadow of Diana remains, and her life continues to enthrall the public. In recent years, she has been the subject of a major film and Broadway musical, while the couple's relationship was at the center of hit Netflix drama "The Crown".

Media Contempt

With tabloids poring over his relationships, it is unsurprising that his dealings with the media have often been testy and he has made no secret of his contempt for the paparazzi.

"I'm not very good at being a performing monkey really. I think I am quite a private person. I'm not prepared to just sort of perform whenever they want me to perform," he said in 1994.

At a photo call on a skiing holiday in 2005 he was overheard calling the media "bloody people", and saying of BBC's royal correspondent: "I can't bear that man. He's so awful."

But by actions such as founding the Duchy Originals brand to promote organic food, and saying he talked to his plants and shook hands with trees when he planted them, some media labelled him a crank who would rather be a farmer than a prince.

He has also been criticized for forthright views on architecture, once calling a planned modernist extension to London's National Gallery a "carbuncle", and accused of "quackery" for his advocacy of alternative medicines.

Biographer Tom Bower said the prince was committed to issues such as the environment, but was stubborn and unable to take criticism himself.

"He's a person who is driven, who undoubtedly wants to do good but doesn't understand that the consequences of a lot of his actions cause a lot of trouble," Bower said.

The criticism has eased in recent years with newspapers instead turning their ire on his son Harry, but it has not gone away.

Media reported in June that he had been involved in a spat with the government over its policy on sending asylum seekers to Rwanda - something the prince was said to have called "appalling", leading to criticism from ministers and newspapers.

"If he's not very careful, those disagreeing with his provocative political interventions may also conclude Britain's constitutional monarchy is no longer worth keeping," the Daily Mail said in its editorial.

Impossible Role

Supporters say this shows the new king is a serious-minded man with a genuine concern for his people.

To some he has an impossible role - either accused of political interference if he takes an interest in social issues or risking being labeled a pampered, cosseted prince.

"Why do you think I've done all this for all these years?" he said in a 2021 TV interview about climate change. "Because I minded about, and always have done, the next generation."

In his diaries, Chris Mullin, a former left-wing Labour Party lawmaker, recalled a visit to Charles's Clarence House home where the then-prince spoke to assembled politicians about his charities.

"Their range is vast, but always he comes back to the same point: the young, especially the disaffected, the unlucky and even the malign," Mullin wrote. "I confess I am impressed. He could fritter away his life on idleness and self-indulgence."