California cities and counties seeking to hold five of the largest oil companies accountable for their contribution to climate change through a trio of lawsuits will make their case in California state court, a judge ruled on Friday.
The decision, viewed by both sides as a defeat for Chevron, BP, Exxon, ConocoPhilips and Shell, creates a split among a pair of San Francisco federal judges over where the cases should be heard, Bloomberg reported.
The state court is seen as more favorable to the cities and counties because there’s a federal precedent for climate law that would tip the scale in the oil companies’ favor.
US District Judge Vince Chhabria’s decision on Friday in cases filed by San Mateo County, Marin County and the city of Imperial Beach conflicts with an order issued on Feb. 28 by Judge William Alsup, who determined that cases filed by San Francisco and Oakland would remain in federal court.
“The scope of the worldwide predicament demands the most comprehensive view available, which in our American court system means our federal courts and our federal common law," Alsup wrote.
“A patchwork of 50 different answers to the same fundamental global issue would be unworkable.”
Chhabria acknowledged Alsup’s ruling on Friday, saying that a need to be heard in a federal court “no longer exists”.
Similar lawsuits filed by Santa Cruz County and the cities of Santa Cruz and Richmond are also before Judge Chhabria and could also be remanded back to state court.
Plaintiffs have argued that litigating the case in a state court creates more favorable prospects than in a federal court.
Add new comment
Read our comment policy before posting your viewpoints