67791
China provided $13.5 billion for fossil fuels but just  $85 million for green energy between 2013-15.
China provided $13.5 billion for fossil fuels but just  $85 million for green energy between 2013-15.

G20 Finance for Fossil Fuels 4 Times Above Renewables

G20 Finance for Fossil Fuels 4 Times Above Renewables

The G20 nations provide four times more public financing to fossil fuels than to renewable energy, a report has revealed ahead of their summit in Hamburg where German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said climate change will be at the heart of the agenda.
The authors of the report accuse the G20 of “talking out of both sides of their mouths” and the summit faces the challenge of a skeptical US administration after Donald Trump pulled out of the global Paris agreement, Guardian reported.
The public finance comes in the form of soft loans and guarantees from governments, and, along with huge fossil fuel subsidies, makes coal, oil and gas plants cheaper and locks in carbon emissions for decades to come.
But scientists calculate that to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, most fossil fuel reserves must be kept in the ground, requiring a major shift of investment to clean energy.
The new report by a coalition of NGOs found that G20 countries provided $71.8 billion of public finance for fossil-fuel projects during 2013-15, compared with just $18.7 billion for renewable energy. Japan provided the most at $16.5 billion, which was six times more than it allotted for renewables.
China, which is curbing its coal use and increasingly being seen as a climate leader, provided $13.5 billion for fossil fuels but just $85 million for green energy.
Germany, also considered a climate leader, provided $3.5 billion of public finance for fossil fuels, compared with $2.4 billion for renewables.
Britain provided $972 million for fossil fuels, compared with $172 million for renewable energy.
“When the G20 countries committed to the Paris agreement, they made a pact with the world that they would take meaningful steps to reduce their carbon emissions to avert the worst effects of the climate crisis,” said Nicole Ghio of the Sierra Club, one of the groups that compiled the report.
“But as we now know, these countries have been talking out of both sides of their mouths. It’s unconscionable that any nation would continue to waste public funds on fossil fuels when clean energy sources are readily available [and] more cost-effective and healthier for families and communities across the globe.”

Short URL : https://goo.gl/pc5b8R
  1. https://goo.gl/ZjAzMA
  • https://goo.gl/Kc6zEJ
  • https://goo.gl/xrnyhi
  • https://goo.gl/sUqqks
  • https://goo.gl/9SmT9t

You can also read ...

The agreement went through after years of on-off negotiations with the French group.
A technology licensing agreement with French company Air...
No licenses have been issued for state and semi-governmental companies to build power plants in the last four years.
The Energy Ministry has privatized over 50% of power plants in...
OPEC to Struggle With Oversupply for Years
When OPEC and Russia first embarked on clearing a global oil...
Iraq Sets Up Oil Shipping, Trading Joint Venture
OPEC member Iraq has formed a joint venture with a shipping...
NISOC Targeting 20% Rise in Recovery Rate
National Iranian South Oil Company aims to increase the...
Brent, WTI Make Gains
Oil prices edged up on Wednesday, lifted by declining US crude...
China Energy Demand to Peak in 2040
China's energy demand will peak by 2040, a decade later than...

Add new comment

Read our comment policy before posting your viewpoints

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Trending

Googleplus