38186
Academics: Caution over Wearables
Economy, Sci & Tech

Academics: Caution over Wearables

Wearable devices to monitor health are not always reliable or secure, according to research carried out by Lancaster University.
The market for digital devices such as smartwatches and fitness bands is growing, with 19 million likely to be sold worldwide this year.
They can measure everything from heart rate to physical activity, temperature and even mental wellbeing.
But research by Lancaster University, the University of the West of England and Nottingham Trent into the rise of consumer health wearables cautions against over-enthusiasm, according to Lancaster Guardian.
The researchers said devices are marketed under the premise that they will help improve general health and fitness, but the majority of manufacturers provide no empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of their products.
Around a third of users stop wearing these devices after six months, and half after one year.
Evidence for the effectiveness of these devices is anecdotal and there is little scientific evidence as to how they improve health.
While consumer wearables could be more useful for patients with conditions like diabetes or cardiac problems, current solutions are still in the early stages of development.
Dr. David Ellis of Lancaster University said, “For chronic conditions, wearables could effortlessly provide detailed longitudinal data that monitors patients’ progress without the need to involve more sophisticated, uncomfortable and expensive alternatives.
“For instance, it is possible to identify the severity of depressive symptoms based on the number of conversations, amount of physical activity and sleep duration using a wearable wristband and smartphone app.”
But although the use of pedometers is linked to an increase in physical activity and a decrease in blood pressure, there is no evidence of long-term change.
Researchers also doubt the reliability and validity of wearable devices.
Recent comparisons between various wearables for tracking physical activity showed large variations in accuracy between different devices–with error margins of up to 25%.
In addition, personal data generated by the device is collected and stored by the manufacturer, not the user, and sometimes sold on to third parties, while digital traces of behavior like location and time can be used to reveal the user’s identity.
The researchers say devices need to be validated and standardized to ensure that wearable technology becomes an asset for healthcare in the 21st century.

 

Short URL : http://goo.gl/uPRGlQ
  1. http://goo.gl/Gzeomd
  • http://goo.gl/NA3Gbw
  • http://goo.gl/1c9iWF
  • http://goo.gl/K5PZUW
  • http://goo.gl/PCHuZM

You can also read ...

Operators Unveil New Services at Telecom 2017
The 18th round of Exhibition of Telecommunications,...
A delegation headed by First Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri was in Ankara on Thursday and reached several deals.
Following several rounds of negotiations between Iranian and...
Evaluating Economic Impact of Shifting Iran-KRG Relations
Iran and the Iraqi Kurdistan Regional Government have...
US Won’t Block  European Trade  With Iran
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the Trump...
All SP Gas Field Phases to Be in Full Swing by March 2019
The South Pars mega project has registered a work-in-progress...
Cyberspace Chief in Tehran:  Time to Fix Legal Flaws in E-Commerce
Secretary of Iran High Council of Cyberspace says the country...
Russia Grain Exports to Iran Reach 220K Tons
Over the first nine months of 2017, exports of Russian wheat,...
Armenia Export Growth in Iran Tops 11%
Armenia has recorded an unprecedented growth in exports to...

Trending

Googleplus