72006
Iranian steel exports, especially HRC shipments, grew nearly eightfold between 2013 and 2016 to just over 1 million tons annually, leading to EC’s dumping allegations against Iran.
Iranian steel exports, especially HRC shipments, grew nearly eightfold between 2013 and 2016 to just over 1 million tons annually, leading to EC’s dumping allegations against Iran.

EU Committee Rejects Anti-Iran HRC Dumping Allegations

EU Committee Rejects Anti-Iran HRC Dumping Allegations

The Trade Defense Instruments Committee of the EU has rejected a proposal to impose definitive anti-dumping measures on the import of hot-rolled coil from Iran and three other countries.
The decision, which was taken last week, does not put an end to the issue, however, and the European Commission may yet set definitive anti-dumping measures by October 6 this year, Metal Bulletin reported.
Iranian steel exports, especially HRC shipments, grew nearly eightfold between 2013 and 2016 to just over 1 million tons annually, leading to EC’s dumping allegations against Iran.
The EC previously released a preliminary document that imposed a minimum import price on HRC from Iran, Russia, Ukraine and Brazil. Suppliers from these four countries will be required to pay anti-dumping duties in the range of 5.30-33% if they sell their products for less than €468.49 ($561.06) per ton at EU border ports.
“The [European] commission has informed all interested parties about the findings so far and presented its proposal to the member states in the Trade Defense Committee. The procedure is continuing, however, and no decision has yet been made,” an EC source said.
“The [Trade Defense] committee did reject the commission’s proposal with a qualified majority vote against, but this doesn’t mean the measure is dead. It merely means that the commission can either make a new proposal or take its existing proposal to appeal,” a spokesman for European steel association, Eurofer, said.
“We have no idea how this is going to play out; only that [the EC] must act quickly, as the deadline for measures is October 6,” he added.
“The Trade Defense Instruments Committee rejected the proposal. It is hard to make any forecasts at this point, but it is not a definitive rejection; it is just one stage of the procedure that the case did not pass,” a trade lawyer involved in the case said.
“The vote will continue in the near future, and it could result in a change of the proposal about the form of trade defense measures.”
Tommaso Sandrini, president of Italian steel distributors’ association Assofermet, said the proposal as written [by the EC] was rejected by a majority of member states. This means that we might get a new proposal from the EC but all the procedures should be completed by October 6.”
“I do not think that there is enough time to make a new proposal, inform all the parties involved, collect feedback and analyze it. They could cancel the MIP, or set a different level of the MIP for different products, or make it adjustable to [accommodate] fluctuations in production costs,” he said.
“There is also an extreme situation where both the EC and the committee maintain their positions. In such a circumstance, if the same proposal is made again, the investigation will end without any outcome–meaning no duties and no MIP,” he said.
“But there is also a chance that the committee will accept it with a few minor amendments. ‘No decision’ is not a good scenario for anyone.”
Sandrini criticized the increasing level of uncertainty in the market.
“We have one more month of ‘wait and see’ before any business is resumed with the four countries. In the medium term, any scenario is possible, but I expect the EC to come up with some kind of compromise,” he added.
When the trade case started in July last year, a consortium of steel companies from Italy and elsewhere across Europe was established by Assofermet to maintain competition in the EU steel market. EU countries, including those with steelmakers and those interested in cheap steel, opposed the overall plan, EU sources told Reuters.
The former believe the measures were too weak, the latter considered them too strong.

 

Short URL : https://goo.gl/Gnyn6K
  1. https://goo.gl/uvL7P2
  • https://goo.gl/DzY6pj
  • https://goo.gl/DfbWox
  • https://goo.gl/GxPioZ
  • https://goo.gl/eYHrNa

You can also read ...

Italy's Ansaldo Set to Produce Power From Iran's South Pars Gas Flares
Italy's Ansaldo Energia signed a memorandum of understanding...
Fate of Cryptocurrency in Iran Hangs in Balance
Virtual currencies are slowly but steadily gaining traction...
IRISL Returns to the Fold of Int’l Shipping Giants
The Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines plans to replace...
Dairy Exports to Hit $1b
Iran is one of the top milk producers and has ambitious plans...
Money and Credit Council Approves Liquidity Risk Management Rules
Money and Credit Council, a top financial decision-making body...
1st Currency ETF  in the Pipeline
The Iranian capital market’s first foreign currency exchange-...
Iran Insurance Growth at 20%
The collective figure of Iranian insurance companies’ premiums...
Iran Eases Imports From Turkey
The issue of “consulate approval”, which negatively affected...

Add new comment

Read our comment policy before posting your viewpoints

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Trending

Googleplus