Art And Culture

New Restoration Technique Leads to Possible Discovery of Michelangelo Drawing

New Restoration Technique Leads to Possible Discovery of Michelangelo DrawingNew Restoration Technique Leads to Possible Discovery of Michelangelo Drawing

By using a new conservation technique for removing tape from artworks, scientists at the University of Florence, Italy, found a clue to the origin of a 16th century drawing underneath a piece of tape.

The world of art restoration moves a bit slower than others. This is the case when a new method for removing tape from prints and drawings makes news, Artnet reported.

This week, a group of researchers at the University of Florence published a study detailing the innovative new technique, which employs a water-retentive hydrogel with nano-sized droplets of organic solvents to remove old pieces of pressure-sensitive tape (known as PSTs) without damaging the substrate underneath. The emulsion slowly penetrates the surface and softens the adhesive underneath without touching the paper. Simply apply the gel to the top of tape, trim it down to size, then peel both off.

The development is bigger than it sounds. Tape, it turns out, is a nightmare for restorers. For one, it is used for wide variety of purposes, including matting, temporary conservation, or simply to adhere or fasten the work to another object. It is also nearly impossible to remove without compromising the integrity of the paper underneath - a problem that only gets worse with age.

This is why a non-invasive removal method is a game-changer. So far, scientists have restored tape-damaged drawings by Maria Helena Vieira da Silva, Stanley William Hayter, and Lucio Fontana, among others.

But their biggest coup came when they were successfully able to remove a piece of tape stuck to a 16th-century drawing from the Sistine Chapel. Underneath, they discovered the inscription, “di mano di Michelangelo” (“from Michelangelo’s hand”). Whether or not the drawing was indeed by Michelangelo is still uncertain; the work is still being investigated by authenticators (and some early reports suggest the signature was erroneously written by a collector). Nevertheless, it is hard to deny the potential impact of the new technique.

Add new comment

Read our comment policy before posting your viewpoints